Hewitt, R. [2020] EWCA Crim 1247 (01 October 2020)
The Court held that, despite serious shortcomings in the disclosure process, the errors were ultimately remedied during the trial. The defence was able to cross-examine witnesses thoroughly, and the trial judge's directions to the jury were sufficient to address the issues of delay and missing documentation. The trial was fair, and the conviction was safe.
- Citation
- [2020] EWCA Crim 1247
- Parties
- Respondent: The Queen; Appellant: Douglas Joseph Hewitt
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Historic Sexual Offences, Disclosure, Abuse of Process, Fair Trial, Jury Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Respondent
Douglas Joseph Hewitt
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to stay the indictment for abuse of process due to inadequate disclosure and missing documentation
- 2 Whether the judge's directions to the jury regarding delay and missing documentation were adequate and whether any inadequacy rendered the conviction unsafe
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that, despite serious shortcomings in the disclosure process, the errors were ultimately remedied during the trial. The defence was able to cross-examine witnesses thoroughly, and the trial judge's directions to the jury were sufficient to address the issues of delay and missing documentation. The trial was fair, and the conviction was safe.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment