Campaign To Protect Rural England (CPRE), R (On the Application Of) v Dover District Council
The planning authority lawfully treated the scheme as a composite development, making the heritage contribution necessary, directly related, and reasonably related in scale and kind; reasons for exceptional circumstances were adequately discernible; housing land supply assessment was properly relied upon; the option agreement for the hotel site was not a material planning consideration.
- Parties
- Claimant: Campaign to Protect Rural England; Defendant: Dover District Council; Interested Party: China Gateway International (CGI) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Rolled Up Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed; permission to amend refused; permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Planning Permission, Section 106 Agreements, Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, Judicial Review, Housing Land Supply, State Aid
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Campaign to Protect Rural England
Claimant
Dover District Council
Defendant
China Gateway International (CGI) Limited
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Rolled Up Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Lawfulness of £5 million heritage contribution under section 106 agreement
- 2 Adequacy of reasons for exceptional circumstances in granting planning permission in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
- 3 Appropriateness of reliance on housing land supply deficit
Ratio Decidendi
The planning authority lawfully treated the scheme as a composite development, making the heritage contribution necessary, directly related, and reasonably related in scale and kind; reasons for exceptional circumstances were adequately discernible; housing land supply assessment was properly relied upon; the option agreement for the hotel site was not a material planning consideration.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed; permission to amend refused; permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Claimants to pay defendant's costs capped at £10,000.
- No extension of time for appeal beyond usual period unless transcript delayed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment