NG v DPP [2006] EWHC 36 (Admin) (26 January 2007)
Evidence of elevated mouth alcohol attributable to eructation is directly connected to the commission of the offence and may amount to a special reason for not imposing obligatory disqualification.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 36 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: O Sang Ng; Defendant: DPP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Disqualification set aside; matter remitted to Magistrates Court for reconsideration of special reasons.
- Legal Topics
- Drink Driving, Special Reasons, Disqualification From Driving
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
O Sang Ng
Claimant
DPP
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether elevated mouth alcohol due to eructation is a circumstance special to the offender or directly connected to the commission of the offence
- 2 Whether evidence of mouth alcohol can amount to a special reason for not imposing obligatory disqualification
Ratio Decidendi
Evidence of elevated mouth alcohol attributable to eructation is directly connected to the commission of the offence and may amount to a special reason for not imposing obligatory disqualification.
Court Disposition
Disqualification set aside; matter remitted to Magistrates Court for reconsideration of special reasons.
Orders
- Disqualification from driving set aside
- Matter remitted to Magistrates Court for reconsideration of special reasons
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment