Jiad v Byford & Ors
The claim for victimisation against Janet Youngson was not bound to fail for want of a comparator or sufficient detriment; the Employment Tribunal applied too stringent a test in striking out the claim. The claims against the other respondents were bound to fail and were rightly struck out.
- Parties
- Appellant: Dr A H Jiad; Respondent: Mark Byford; Respondent: Lesley Grainger; Respondent: Janet Youngson; Respondent: Greg Dyke
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Victimisation, Racial Discrimination, Detriment, Striking Out Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr A H Jiad
Appellant
Mark Byford
Respondent
Lesley Grainger
Respondent
Janet Youngson
Respondent
Greg Dyke
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal was correct to strike out Dr Jiad's claim for racial discrimination and victimisation under the Race Relations Act 1976 as bound to fail
- 2 Whether the claim disclosed an arguable case of detriment and less favourable treatment
- 3 Whether the absence of a comparator was fatal to the claim
Ratio Decidendi
The claim for victimisation against Janet Youngson was not bound to fail for want of a comparator or sufficient detriment; the Employment Tribunal applied too stringent a test in striking out the claim. The claims against the other respondents were bound to fail and were rightly struck out.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Claim for victimisation against Janet Youngson reinstated and remitted to a differently constituted Employment Tribunal
- Costs order in favour of Janet Youngson set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment