Jiad v BBC World Service & Ors [2002] EWCA Civ 956 (20 June 2002)
The application for permission to appeal was refused because the proposed appeal raised no arguable point of law, the Employment Tribunal's findings were within its remit, the reasoning met the Meek test, there was no evidence of bias, and the costs order was within the Employment Appeal Tribunal's discretion.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 956
- Parties
- Applicant: Dr A Jiad; Respondent: BBC World Service; Respondent: Hassan Muawad; Respondent: Gamon McLellan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permission to Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal, Post Employment Appeal Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Victimisation, Employment Tribunal Procedure, Costs Orders, Bias Allegations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr A Jiad
Applicant
BBC World Service
Respondent
Hassan Muawad
Respondent
Gamon McLellan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal, Post Employment Appeal Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in dismissing claims of race discrimination and victimisation
- 2 Whether the Employment Appeal Tribunal erred in upholding the Employment Tribunal's decision
- 3 Whether there was judicial bias or procedural unfairness in the Employment Appeal Tribunal
Ratio Decidendi
The application for permission to appeal was refused because the proposed appeal raised no arguable point of law, the Employment Tribunal's findings were within its remit, the reasoning met the Meek test, there was no evidence of bias, and the costs order was within the Employment Appeal Tribunal's discretion.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application refused
- Applicant to pay respondents' costs assessed at £800
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment