Cullen & Anor v Chopra
Notice of funding is not required to be served pre-issue under the Clinical Negligence Protocol or Practice Direction; 'should inform' is a recommendation, not a requirement, so Mrs Cullen is entitled to recover the success fee from the date the CFA was signed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Sam Cullen; Claimant: Janice Cullen; Defendant: Dr Anil Chopra
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Assessment / Judgment on Preliminary Point Regarding Recoverability of Success Fee
- Outcome
- Mrs Cullen permitted to recover a success fee from the date the CFA was signed.
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Fee Agreements, Success Fee, Notice of Funding, Pre Action Protocols, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sam Cullen
Claimant
Janice Cullen
Claimant
Dr Anil Chopra
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment / Judgment on Preliminary Point Regarding Recoverability of Success Fee
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a claimant can recover a success fee under a CFA for the period before notice of funding was served
- 2 Whether pre-action protocols or practice directions require notice of funding to be given pre-issue
Ratio Decidendi
Notice of funding is not required to be served pre-issue under the Clinical Negligence Protocol or Practice Direction; 'should inform' is a recommendation, not a requirement, so Mrs Cullen is entitled to recover the success fee from the date the CFA was signed.
Court Disposition
Mrs Cullen permitted to recover a success fee from the date the CFA was signed.
Orders
- Mrs Cullen may recover a success fee on Gadsby Wicks’ fees claimed in the CFA from 24 January 2005.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment