Lonsdale v Bar Standards Board & Ors [2014] EWHC 4320 (Admin) (18 December 2014)
Although the defendant succeeded on the jurisdiction issue, the sum in dispute was small and the public interest in resolving the jurisdictional question was significant; therefore, a proportionate costs order of £5,000 was appropriate rather than the full amount claimed.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 4320 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Ms Marion Lonsdale; First Defendant: Bar Standards Board; Defendant: Dr Ann Barker; Defendant: Disciplinary Tribunal of the Council of the Inns of Court
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Costs Judgment Following Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Claimant ordered to pay defendant's costs of the hearing on 8 October 2014, summarily assessed at £5,000.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Jurisdiction, Disciplinary Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Marion Lonsdale
Claimant
Bar Standards Board
First Defendant
Dr Ann Barker
Defendant
Disciplinary Tribunal of the Council of the Inns of Court
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Costs Judgment Following Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant should pay the defendant's costs for the disciplinary proceedings (Ground 2)
- 2 Appropriate quantum of costs to be awarded
Ratio Decidendi
Although the defendant succeeded on the jurisdiction issue, the sum in dispute was small and the public interest in resolving the jurisdictional question was significant; therefore, a proportionate costs order of £5,000 was appropriate rather than the full amount claimed.
Court Disposition
Claimant ordered to pay defendant's costs of the hearing on 8 October 2014, summarily assessed at £5,000.
Orders
- Claimant to pay £5,000 to the defendant as costs of the hearing on 8 October 2014.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment