Kohli v Lit & Ors
The directors of Sunrise Radio Limited breached their fiduciary duties by failing to properly consider the price of share allotments, failing to obtain shareholder approval for the sale of Jersey House, failing to ensure transparency in accounting for directors’ remuneration, and repeatedly failing to comply with statutory requirements for filings and disclosures. These acts, cumulatively, constituted unfair prejudice to Ms Kohli under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006, entitling her to a buy-out order at an undiscounted value.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Geeta Kohli; Respondent: Dr Avtar Lit; Respondent: Ravinder Kumar Jain; Respondent: Surinderpal Singh Lit; Respondent: Sunrise Radio Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Petition Under Companies Act / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition upheld; unfair prejudice established.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Prejudice, Shareholder Remedies, Directors' Duties, Share Allotment, Remuneration, Accounting Transparency, Sale of Company Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Geeta Kohli
Petitioner
Dr Avtar Lit
Respondent
Ravinder Kumar Jain
Respondent
Surinderpal Singh Lit
Respondent
Sunrise Radio Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition Under Companies Act / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the affairs of Sunrise Radio Limited were conducted in a manner unfairly prejudicial to the interests of the petitioner under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006
- 2 Whether the 2005 share allotment and 2007 share capital increase were improperly executed and prejudicial
- 3 Whether consultancy payments to Dr Lit and associated companies were authorised and fair
Ratio Decidendi
The directors of Sunrise Radio Limited breached their fiduciary duties by failing to properly consider the price of share allotments, failing to obtain shareholder approval for the sale of Jersey House, failing to ensure transparency in accounting for directors’ remuneration, and repeatedly failing to comply with statutory requirements for filings and disclosures. These acts, cumulatively, constituted unfair prejudice to Ms Kohli under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006, entitling her to a buy-out order at an undiscounted value.
Court Disposition
Petition upheld; unfair prejudice established.
Orders
- Ms Kohli to be bought out by the individual respondents (primarily Dr Lit, with joint and several liability for Mr Jain and Tony Lit) at an undiscounted value of her shares.
- Valuation to be based on what the issued share capital would have been had £200,000 been raised from ABC in 2005 at the appropriate issue price, determined by the value of Sunrise as a whole in October 2005.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment