Dr Christopher Garrard v The Information Commissioner & Anor
The Cabinet Office holds further information within the scope of the request; section 27 exemption is engaged for certain withheld passages, but not all; section 36 exemption not reasonably engaged for passages not covered by section 27; public interest in disclosure outweighs exemption for some information, but not all.
- Parties
- Appellant: Dr Christopher Garrard; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Cabinet Office
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information Act, International Relations, Public Interest Test, Government Policy, Prejudice to Effective Conduct of Public Affairs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr Christopher Garrard
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
First Respondent
Cabinet Office
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Cabinet Office holds further information within the scope of the FOIA request
- 2 Whether withheld information is exempt under section 27 and/or section 36 FOIA
- 3 Whether the public interest in maintaining exemptions outweighs the public interest in disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
The Cabinet Office holds further information within the scope of the request; section 27 exemption is engaged for certain withheld passages, but not all; section 36 exemption not reasonably engaged for passages not covered by section 27; public interest in disclosure outweighs exemption for some information, but not all.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Cabinet Office to undertake further search of email archive and issue fresh response within 35 days
- Cabinet Office to provide fresh response regarding Information A and either supply or refuse under section 17 FOIA
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment