Aderounmu v Colvin (Costs) [2022] EWHC 637 (QB) (22 March 2022)
Claimant is successful party on preliminary issue; costs increased by manner in which Claimant's experts were instructed; Claimant awarded 70% of costs on standard basis, not indemnity; interim payment on account of costs ordered based on budgeted and incurred costs.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 637
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr Oluseye Aderounmu; Defendant: Dr Deborah Colvin
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Clinical Negligence / Costs Ruling After Preliminary Issue Trial
- Outcome
- Claimant awarded 70% of costs of preliminary issue on standard basis, to be assessed if not agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Limitation, Costs, Mental Capacity, Section 33 Limitation Act
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Oluseye Aderounmu
Claimant
Dr Deborah Colvin
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Clinical Negligence / Costs Ruling After Preliminary Issue Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant had capacity to litigate at all material times
- 2 Whether the limitation period had started to run
- 3 Whether it was equitable to allow the action to proceed under section 33 Limitation Act
Ratio Decidendi
Claimant is successful party on preliminary issue; costs increased by manner in which Claimant's experts were instructed; Claimant awarded 70% of costs on standard basis, not indemnity; interim payment on account of costs ordered based on budgeted and incurred costs.
Court Disposition
Claimant awarded 70% of costs of preliminary issue on standard basis, to be assessed if not agreed.
Orders
- Defendant to pay 70% of Claimant's costs of preliminary issue.
- Interim payment on account of costs in sum of £70,000 plus VAT.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment