F (Children)
The judge at first instance was entitled to prefer the mother's case as primary carer, given the evidence and high conflict between the parties. The contact order, though not precisely matching the CAFCASS officer's recommendation, was within the judge's discretion. The costs order was proportionate and justified by the father's failure to respond to a reasonable settlement offer. No procedural irregularity or error of law rendered the decision appealable.
- Parties
- Appellant: Dr F; Respondent: Mrs F
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Children / Application for Permission to Appeal From Residence and Contact Order
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Residence Orders, Contact Orders, Costs in Family Proceedings, Appeals Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr F
Appellant
Mrs F
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Children / Application for Permission to Appeal From Residence and Contact Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in awarding sole residence to the mother
- 2 Whether the contact order was justified on the evidence
- 3 Whether the costs order against the father was proper
Ratio Decidendi
The judge at first instance was entitled to prefer the mother's case as primary carer, given the evidence and high conflict between the parties. The contact order, though not precisely matching the CAFCASS officer's recommendation, was within the judge's discretion. The costs order was proportionate and justified by the father's failure to respond to a reasonable settlement offer. No procedural irregularity or error of law rendered the decision appealable.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- No variation of residence or contact order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment