Cranstoun & Anor v Notta

Cranstoun & Anor v Notta

The correct date for valuation under the CSA is the date of judgment, as this best preserves the commercial purpose of the agreement and ensures the assets are valued as a going concern. The valuation of the Defendant’s practice assets is £96,000, based on a fair maintainable operating profit of £120,000 and a multiplier of 0.8, reflecting sustainability of trade, condition of premises, effects of the pandemic, and the aura of conflict at the practice.

Parties
Claimant: Dr Nigel Cranstoun; Claimant: Dr Claire Rumley; Defendant: Dr Gurpreet Notta
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 December 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
judgment for claimants
Legal Topics
Valuation Date, Practice Asset Valuation, Termination of Agreement, Interpretation of Contract Clauses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr Nigel Cranstoun

Claimant

Dr Claire Rumley

Claimant

Dr Gurpreet Notta

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment After Trial

  1. 1 What is the appropriate date for the valuation of the Defendant’s interests?
  2. 2 What is the appropriate valuation of the Defendant’s interests on that date?

Ratio Decidendi

The correct date for valuation under the CSA is the date of judgment, as this best preserves the commercial purpose of the agreement and ensures the assets are valued as a going concern. The valuation of the Defendant’s practice assets is £96,000, based on a fair maintainable operating profit of £120,000 and a multiplier of 0.8, reflecting sustainability of trade, condition of premises, effects of the pandemic, and the aura of conflict at the practice.

Court Disposition

judgment for claimants

Orders

  • Declaration that the appropriate date for valuation is 21 December 2020
  • Declaration that the valuation of the Defendant’s practice assets is £96,000