Burnett v Lynch

Burnett v Lynch

The trial judge was entitled to prefer the Respondent's evidence, supported by other witnesses and medical records, over the Appellant's, and gave sufficient reasons for his findings. There was no inconsistency, failure to consider material evidence, or inadequacy of reasons. The appeal is dismissed.

Parties
Respondent: Audrey Burnett; Appellant: Dr Lynch
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 March 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Clinical Negligence, Breach of Duty, Causation, Standard of Proof, Findings of Fact, Judicial Reasoning
Medical Negligence Tort Law Clinical Negligence Breach of Duty Causation Standard of Proof Findings of Fact Judicial Reasoning

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Audrey Burnett

Respondent

Dr Lynch

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge made inconsistent or perverse findings of fact
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge failed to consider material evidence
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge gave adequate reasons for his decision

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge was entitled to prefer the Respondent's evidence, supported by other witnesses and medical records, over the Appellant's, and gave sufficient reasons for his findings. There was no inconsistency, failure to consider material evidence, or inadequacy of reasons. The appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed