Paszkiewicz v Jeyes Ltd

Paszkiewicz v Jeyes Ltd

No error of law was shown in the Employment Tribunal's finding that the applicant's dismissal was by reason of redundancy. The Tribunal was entitled to conclude the employer's requirements for employees to carry out the applicant's work had diminished. No arguable point of law or compelling reason for a second...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Dr M Paszkiewicz; Respondent: Jeyes Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 July 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Make a Second Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Redundancy, Age Discrimination, Appeals Procedure
Employment Law Unfair Dismissal Redundancy Age Discrimination Appeals Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr M Paszkiewicz

Applicant

Jeyes Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Make a Second Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in finding the applicant's dismissal was by reason of redundancy
  2. 2 Whether there was unlawful age discrimination in the dismissal or prior appointment process
  3. 3 Whether there is a point of law justifying a second appeal

Ratio Decidendi

No error of law was shown in the Employment Tribunal's finding that the applicant's dismissal was by reason of redundancy. The Tribunal was entitled to conclude the employer's requirements for employees to carry out the applicant's work had diminished. No arguable point of law or compelling reason for a second appeal was demonstrated.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal refused