C (Children)

C (Children)

The judge properly exercised his discretion in refusing to order a fact-finding hearing, given that the history of domestic violence was already established by criminal convictions, there were no fresh allegations, contact was progressing, and the resource implications of an unnecessary hearing were significant.

Parties
Appellant: Dr M T Deignan; Respondent: Ms A Spencer
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 July 2009
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Willesden County Court Regarding Refusal to Order a Fact Finding Hearing in Child Contact Proceedings
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Contact Orders, Domestic Violence, Fact Finding Hearings, Case Management Discretion
Family Law Child Law Contact Orders Domestic Violence Fact Finding Hearings Case Management Discretion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr M T Deignan

Appellant

Ms A Spencer

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Willesden County Court Regarding Refusal to Order a Fact Finding Hearing in Child Contact Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the judge erred in refusing to order a fact-finding hearing regarding allegations of domestic violence in child contact proceedings
  2. 2 Whether the judge properly exercised discretion in case management

Ratio Decidendi

The judge properly exercised his discretion in refusing to order a fact-finding hearing, given that the history of domestic violence was already established by criminal convictions, there were no fresh allegations, contact was progressing, and the resource implications of an unnecessary hearing were significant.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Permission to appeal granted
  • Appeal dismissed