General Medical Council, R (on the application of) v Stevenson [2007] EWHC 2132 (Admin) (06 September 2007)
An extension of nine months is appropriate, balancing the need for public protection and the ongoing investigation with the respondent's mental health and the lack of evidence of investigative progress by the GMC.
- Citation
- [2007] EWHC 2132 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: General Medical Council; Defendant: Dr Michael Stevenson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Application to Extend Interim Suspension Order
- Outcome
- Interim suspension order extended for nine months from 7 September 2007 to 6 June 2008. No order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Suspension, Fitness to Practise, Manslaughter Conviction, Professional Misconduct, Public Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
General Medical Council
Claimant
Dr Michael Stevenson
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application to Extend Interim Suspension Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the interim suspension of Dr Michael Stevenson should be extended and for what period
- 2 Whether the extension should be for 6, 9, or 12 months
Ratio Decidendi
An extension of nine months is appropriate, balancing the need for public protection and the ongoing investigation with the respondent's mental health and the lack of evidence of investigative progress by the GMC.
Court Disposition
Interim suspension order extended for nine months from 7 September 2007 to 6 June 2008. No order as to costs.
Orders
- Extension of interim suspension for nine months
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment