Dr Mohamad Alruby v NHS England

Dr Mohamad Alruby v NHS England

There is more than adequate justification for concern as to professional competence and lack of insight by Dr Alruby. The current conditions are reasonable, fair, proportionate, and appropriate to prevent prejudice to the efficiency of services and ensure patient safety. Unconditional inclusion is not warranted.

Parties
Appellant: Dr Mohamad Alruby; Respondent: NHS England
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 December 2025
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
appeal refused
Legal Topics
Performers List, Clinical Competence, Professional Regulation, Conditions on Practice
Health Law Administrative Law Performers List Clinical Competence Professional Regulation Conditions on Practice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr Mohamad Alruby

Appellant

NHS England

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether conditions should be maintained on Dr Alruby's inclusion in the NHS Performers List
  2. 2 Whether unconditional inclusion is appropriate
  3. 3 Whether procedural fairness was observed

Ratio Decidendi

There is more than adequate justification for concern as to professional competence and lack of insight by Dr Alruby. The current conditions are reasonable, fair, proportionate, and appropriate to prevent prejudice to the efficiency of services and ensure patient safety. Unconditional inclusion is not warranted.

Court Disposition

appeal refused

Orders

  • Current conditions on Dr Alruby's inclusion in the performers list shall remain in force.