McCabe v Moore & Ors [2015] EWHC 260 (QB) (11 February 2015)

McCabe v Moore & Ors [2015] EWHC 260 (QB) (11 February 2015)

The court found that the Claimant's symptoms of leg pain, night sweats, and feeling unwell began in February 2009 and progressively worsened. However, at the material consultations, the Claimant did not communicate symptoms that would have required the Defendants to suspect or investigate infective endocarditis. The Defendants' actions did not fall below the standard of care required of a reasonably competent GP in the circumstances. Causation was not established as no breach was found.

Citation
[2015] EWHC 260 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: Sandra McCabe; Defendant: Dr Moore; Defendant: Dr Fisher; Defendant: Dr Hall
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 February 2015
Procedural Posture
Clinical Negligence / Judgment on Liability and Causation; Damages Agreed
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Standard of Care, Causation, Duty of Care, Diagnosis Failure, General Practitioner Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sandra McCabe

Claimant

Dr Moore

Defendant

Dr Fisher

Defendant

Dr Hall

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Clinical Negligence / Judgment on Liability and Causation; Damages Agreed

  1. 1 Whether the Defendants breached their duty of care in failing to diagnose or refer the Claimant for infective endocarditis
  2. 2 Whether such breach, if any, caused the Claimant's stroke and subsequent injury

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Claimant's symptoms of leg pain, night sweats, and feeling unwell began in February 2009 and progressively worsened. However, at the material consultations, the Claimant did not communicate symptoms that would have required the Defendants to suspect or investigate infective endocarditis. The Defendants' actions did not fall below the standard of care required of a reasonably competent GP in the circumstances. Causation was not established as no breach was found.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed