Oakes v Neininger & Ors

Oakes v Neininger & Ors

Dr Neininger breached his duty by failing to warn the claimant about CES symptoms and the need for urgent action after being told of bilateral leg pain. Dr Brown and the 2nd ambulance crew admitted breach by not ensuring hospital admission for suspected CESI. These breaches caused the claimant to miss the window for surgery while still at the CESI stage, resulting in permanent injury. The 1st ambulance crew was not liable as there was insufficient evidence they were told of relevant symptoms. Earlier surgery would have prevented the severe consequences suffered.

Parties
Claimant: Stephen Andrew Oakes; Defendant: Dr P Neininger; Defendant: Dr M Brown; Defendant: Greater Manchester Ambulance Service (GMAS)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 March 2008
Procedural Posture
Medical Negligence Claim / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Liability established against Dr Neininger, Dr Brown, and GMAS (2nd ambulance crew); 1st ambulance crew not liable.
Legal Topics
Breach of Duty, Causation, Damages, Standard of Care, Professional Negligence
Tort Medical Negligence Breach of Duty Causation Damages Standard of Care Professional Negligence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen Andrew Oakes

Claimant

Dr P Neininger

Defendant

Dr M Brown

Defendant

Greater Manchester Ambulance Service (GMAS)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Medical Negligence Claim / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Dr Neininger breached his duty of care by failing to warn the claimant about CES symptoms and need for urgent action
  2. 2 Whether Dr Brown and the 2nd ambulance crew breached their duty by failing to ensure hospital admission for suspected CESI
  3. 3 Whether the breaches of duty caused the claimant’s injuries

Ratio Decidendi

Dr Neininger breached his duty by failing to warn the claimant about CES symptoms and the need for urgent action after being told of bilateral leg pain. Dr Brown and the 2nd ambulance crew admitted breach by not ensuring hospital admission for suspected CESI. These breaches caused the claimant to miss the window for surgery while still at the CESI stage, resulting in permanent injury. The 1st ambulance crew was not liable as there was insufficient evidence they were told of relevant symptoms. Earlier surgery would have prevented the severe consequences suffered.

Court Disposition

Liability established against Dr Neininger, Dr Brown, and GMAS (2nd ambulance crew); 1st ambulance crew not liable.

Orders

  • Judgment for the claimant on liability against Dr Neininger, Dr Brown, and GMAS (2nd ambulance crew)
  • Assessment of damages to be determined