John-Charles v Weir & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 872 (29 July 2010)

John-Charles v Weir & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 872 (29 July 2010)

The applicant's resignation was not in response to any repudiatory breach by the employer; the Employment Tribunal's findings of fact were rational and disclosed no error of law. The applicant's claims of constructive dismissal, race discrimination, and breach of statutory rights were properly rejected. No arguable error of law was identified to justify permission to appeal.

Citation
[2010] EWCA Civ 872
Parties
Appellant: Dr Peter John-Charles; Respondent: John Weir; Respondent: Thornton Grammar School
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 July 2010
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Race Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Constructive Dismissal, Employment Contract, Procedural Fairness
Employment Law Discrimination Law Race Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Constructive Dismissal Employment Contract Procedural Fairness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr Peter John-Charles

Appellant

John Weir

Respondent

Thornton Grammar School

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was constructively dismissed in response to repudiatory conduct by the employer
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was subject to race discrimination
  3. 3 Whether the applicant's resignation was in response to a breach of contract by the employer

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's resignation was not in response to any repudiatory breach by the employer; the Employment Tribunal's findings of fact were rational and disclosed no error of law. The applicant's claims of constructive dismissal, race discrimination, and breach of statutory rights were properly rejected. No arguable error of law was identified to justify permission to appeal.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal refused