Dr Philip Wise v Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
The DVLA does not hold the specific terms of reference requested by the appellant, and the request was based on the appellant's assumption that such a document existed. The DVLA made reasonable attempts to clarify the request and complied with its duty under section 16(1) of FOIA. There is no evidence that the DVLA holds the information sought.
- Parties
- Appellant: Dr Philip Wise; First Respondent: Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency; Second Respondent: Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Duty to Provide Advice and Assistance, Disclosure of Information, Public Authority Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr Philip Wise
Appellant
Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
First Respondent
Information Commissioner
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the DVLA holds the requested information under section 1 of FOIA
- 2 Whether the DVLA complied with section 16(1) of FOIA
Ratio Decidendi
The DVLA does not hold the specific terms of reference requested by the appellant, and the request was based on the appellant's assumption that such a document existed. The DVLA made reasonable attempts to clarify the request and complied with its duty under section 16(1) of FOIA. There is no evidence that the DVLA holds the information sought.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The decision that the DVLA does not hold the requested information and that the DVLA complied with section 16(1) is confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment