Guthrie v Morel & ors
The deceased intended by his Will to deal with his entire estate, and the reference to '87 Loma Del Rey' was a mistake for '81 Loma Del Rey', the property he owned. The Will should be construed accordingly, and there is no need for a trial as there is no real prospect of the defendants succeeding at trial.
- Parties
- Claimant: Carol Guthrie; Defendant: Drew Brian Morel; Defendant: Lazare James Morel; Defendant: Deyo Morel
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Probate/will Construction / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Application for summary judgment granted in favour of the claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Wills, Rectification of Wills, Summary Judgment, Partial Intestacy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Carol Guthrie
Claimant
Drew Brian Morel
Defendant
Lazare James Morel
Defendant
Deyo Morel
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate/will Construction / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the reference to '87 Loma Del Rey' in the Will should be construed as '81 Loma Del Rey'
- 2 Whether the matter is suitable for summary judgment or requires a full trial
Ratio Decidendi
The deceased intended by his Will to deal with his entire estate, and the reference to '87 Loma Del Rey' was a mistake for '81 Loma Del Rey', the property he owned. The Will should be construed accordingly, and there is no need for a trial as there is no real prospect of the defendants succeeding at trial.
Court Disposition
Application for summary judgment granted in favour of the claimant.
Orders
- Declaration that the reference to '87 Loma Del Rey' in the Will is to be construed as '81 Loma Del Rey' and the property is bequeathed to Carol Guthrie.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment