R v Driss Serhir
There were no arguable grounds to doubt the fairness of the trial or the safety of the conviction. The trial was fair, the evidence was overwhelming, and the sentence was within the appropriate range with all relevant mitigation considered. There was no justification for extending time to appeal.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Driss Serhir
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- renewed applications for leave to appeal conviction and sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Rape of a Child Under 13, Bad Character Evidence, Admissibility of Evidence, Sentencing, Extension of Time, Jury Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Driss Serhir
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to appeal conviction and sentence
- 2 Whether the conviction is safe given the grounds raised by the applicant
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or failed to consider mitigation
Ratio Decidendi
There were no arguable grounds to doubt the fairness of the trial or the safety of the conviction. The trial was fair, the evidence was overwhelming, and the sentence was within the appropriate range with all relevant mitigation considered. There was no justification for extending time to appeal.
Court Disposition
renewed applications for leave to appeal conviction and sentence refused
Orders
- Extension of time to appeal conviction refused
- Extension of time to appeal sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment