DS Smith Plc, Re [2025] EWHC 696 (Ch) (30 January 2025)
The scheme of arrangement satisfies all statutory and jurisdictional requirements under Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006, is fair and reasonable to the class of shareholders, involves no improper inducements or fracturing elements, and is free from technical or legal defects. The court therefore sanctions the scheme.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 696 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant: DS Smith Plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Scheme of Arrangement (companies Act 2006, Part 26) / Sanction Hearing
- Outcome
- Scheme sanctioned
- Legal Topics
- Scheme of Arrangement, Shareholder Approval, Cross Border Mergers, Sanction of Court, Director Remuneration, US Securities Law Exemption
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DS Smith Plc
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Scheme of Arrangement (companies Act 2006, Part 26) / Sanction Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed scheme of arrangement satisfies the jurisdictional and statutory requirements under Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006
- 2 Whether the scheme is fair and reasonable to the class of shareholders
- 3 Whether any fracturing element or improper inducement exists due to director or employee benefits
Ratio Decidendi
The scheme of arrangement satisfies all statutory and jurisdictional requirements under Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006, is fair and reasonable to the class of shareholders, involves no improper inducements or fracturing elements, and is free from technical or legal defects. The court therefore sanctions the scheme.
Court Disposition
Scheme sanctioned
Orders
- The scheme of arrangement between DS Smith Plc and its shareholders is sanctioned under Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006.
- Permission granted for the introduction and reliance on expert evidence regarding US securities law exemption.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment