Al-Iqra & Ors v DSG Retail Ltd

Al-Iqra & Ors v DSG Retail Ltd

On the balance of probabilities, the Heater was the source of the fire. In the absence of misuse, this establishes defect under the Consumer Protection Act 1987, even though the precise mechanism of ignition was not identified. The Heater failed in normal use and thus was defective.

Parties
Claimant: Master Zayyaan Al-Iqra; Claimant: Master Zeeshaan Al-Igra; Defendant: DSG Retail Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 March 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil / Liability Trial
Outcome
judgment for the claimants
Legal Topics
Consumer Protection Act 1987, Defective Products, Causation, Standard of Safety, Fire Damage, Personal Injury

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Master Zayyaan Al-Iqra

Claimant

Master Zeeshaan Al-Igra

Claimant

DSG Retail Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Liability Trial

  1. 1 Whether the Matsui MRHE 1800 Tower Oscillating Fan Heater was the source of the fire
  2. 2 Whether the Heater was defective within the meaning of the Consumer Protection Act 1987

Ratio Decidendi

On the balance of probabilities, the Heater was the source of the fire. In the absence of misuse, this establishes defect under the Consumer Protection Act 1987, even though the precise mechanism of ignition was not identified. The Heater failed in normal use and thus was defective.

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimants

Orders

  • Damages to be assessed
  • Parties to agree the form of order including costs