Oliver and Anor v Dubai Bank Kenya Ltd

Oliver and Anor v Dubai Bank Kenya Ltd

Condition 3 of the standby letter of credit is not to be disregarded under the UCP, as it stipulates payment against presentation of specified documents, including a telex to be issued by the bank. The bank is not in breach of any obligation to issue the telex, as it has acted in good faith and has not received instructions to do so. The claimants’ interpretation of condition 3 is rejected, and the claims are dismissed.

Parties
Claimants: Phillip Thomas Oliver and anor; Defendant: Dubai Bank Kenya Ltd.
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 September 2007
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim / Judgment After Expedited Trial
Outcome
Claims dismissed
Legal Topics
Standby Letters of Credit, Documentary Credits, Uniform Customs and Practice (ucp), Contract Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Phillip Thomas Oliver and anor

Claimants

Dubai Bank Kenya Ltd.

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Claim / Judgment After Expedited Trial

  1. 1 Whether condition 3 of the standby letter of credit is to be disregarded under the UCP
  2. 2 Whether the bank is in breach of an obligation to issue a telex under the letter of credit

Ratio Decidendi

Condition 3 of the standby letter of credit is not to be disregarded under the UCP, as it stipulates payment against presentation of specified documents, including a telex to be issued by the bank. The bank is not in breach of any obligation to issue the telex, as it has acted in good faith and has not received instructions to do so. The claimants’ interpretation of condition 3 is rejected, and the claims are dismissed.

Court Disposition

Claims dismissed