Melia v Dublin High Court Ireland
Removal to Ireland for retrial is not so oppressive as to constitute a bar; all reasonable steps must be taken to ensure proper care during removal; application for adjournment is refused and appeal dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Melia; Defendant: Dublin High Court Ireland
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; application for adjournment refused.
- Legal Topics
- Extradition, Oppression Bar, Medical Grounds, Adjournment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Melia
Claimant
Dublin High Court Ireland
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether removal of the appellant to Ireland for retrial would be oppressive due to his medical condition
- 2 Whether an adjournment should be granted to obtain an updated medical report
Ratio Decidendi
Removal to Ireland for retrial is not so oppressive as to constitute a bar; all reasonable steps must be taken to ensure proper care during removal; application for adjournment is refused and appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; application for adjournment refused.
Orders
- Application for adjournment refused.
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment