Balu v Dudley Primary Care Trust
Privilege in the August and September notes and related documents was waived by the claimant's conduct, including unconditional disclosure to the PCT, inclusion in the hearing bundle, use in evidence, and failure to object or restrict use. There was no remaining confidentiality between the parties, and privilege could not be asserted before the FHSAA. Appeal dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Balu; Defendant: Dudley Primary Care Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Legal Professional Privilege, Waiver of Privilege, Removal From Performers List, Disclosure of Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Balu
Claimant
Dudley Primary Care Trust
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether retrospective notes and related documents were protected by legal advice privilege
- 2 Whether privilege was waived by disclosure and conduct before the Professional List Panel
- 3 Whether privilege could be asserted in subsequent proceedings before the FHSAA
Ratio Decidendi
Privilege in the August and September notes and related documents was waived by the claimant's conduct, including unconditional disclosure to the PCT, inclusion in the hearing bundle, use in evidence, and failure to object or restrict use. There was no remaining confidentiality between the parties, and privilege could not be asserted before the FHSAA. Appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellant to pay respondent’s costs, assessed at £9,000, within 28 days
- Permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment