Kahn v Dunlop Haywards (DHL) Ltd
The court found that the claimant's interpretation of the special bonus agreement was correct. The agreement, as confirmed by the claimant's email of 18 March 2005 and accepted by the defendant, entitled the claimant to bonuses on all referrals, including repeat business, without the application of the 70/30...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr David Kahn; Defendant: Dunlop Haywards (DHL) Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Bonus Entitlement, Interpretation of Employment Contracts, Implied Terms, Remuneration Disputes
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr David Kahn
Claimant
Dunlop Haywards (DHL) Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to bonuses under a special bonus scheme for 2005 and 2006
- 2 Proper interpretation of the special bonus agreement reached between the claimant and defendant
- 3 Whether the 70/30 departmental split applies to the claimant's bonus calculation
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant's interpretation of the special bonus agreement was correct. The agreement, as confirmed by the claimant's email of 18 March 2005 and accepted by the defendant, entitled the claimant to bonuses on all referrals, including repeat business, without the application of the 70/30 departmental split. The worked example in the email supported this interpretation, and the factual matrix indicated the agreement was intended to provide a material improvement over the standard scheme to retain the claimant and his client base.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- An account is to be taken of all bonus payments due to the claimant under the special bonus scheme for 2005 and 2006, in accordance with the claimant's interpretation as accepted by the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment