Community Care North East (A Partnership) v Durham County Council
The court does not have power to vary the terms of the settlement agreement in the schedule to the Tomlin Order except on contractual grounds, and the circumstances relied on do not justify variation. The March 2009 Order does not preclude the Council from exercising any powers it would otherwise have to terminate...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Community Care North East; Defendant: Durham County Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Ruling on Application to Vary Tomlin Order and for Declaration
- Outcome
- Application to vary Tomlin Order dismissed; declaration granted.
- Legal Topics
- Tomlin Orders, Consent Orders, Variation of Settlement Agreements, Public Contracts Regulations, Tender Process Termination
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Community Care North East
Claimant
Durham County Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application / Ruling on Application to Vary Tomlin Order and for Declaration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has power to vary the terms of a Tomlin Order
- 2 Whether the court should exercise any power to vary the terms in the circumstances
- 3 Whether the Council is precluded from terminating the tender process under the Tomlin Order
Ratio Decidendi
The court does not have power to vary the terms of the settlement agreement in the schedule to the Tomlin Order except on contractual grounds, and the circumstances relied on do not justify variation. The March 2009 Order does not preclude the Council from exercising any powers it would otherwise have to terminate the procurement process and start afresh.
Court Disposition
Application to vary Tomlin Order dismissed; declaration granted.
Orders
- The application by Durham County Council to vary the terms of the March 2009 Order is dismissed.
- Declaration granted: The terms of the agreement in the schedule to the March 2009 Order do not preclude the Council from exercising any powers they would otherwise have to terminate the current procurement process and start afresh.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment