Kincaid v Hartlepool Borough Council Northumbrian Water [2000] EWCA Civ 390 (5 December 2000)
The accident was not reasonably foreseeable and the occupiers fulfilled their duty of care; fencing or warnings were impracticable and unnecessary; the structure itself served as a warning; no liability attaches to the defendants.
- Citation
- [2000] EWCA Civ 390
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Donald Angus Kincaid; Respondent/defendant: Hartlepool Borough Council; Respondent/defendant: Northumbrian Water
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Duty of Care, Foreseeability, Contributory Negligence, Warning Signs, Fencing, Accidents on Public Land
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Donald Angus Kincaid
Appellant/claimant
Hartlepool Borough Council
Respondent/defendant
Northumbrian Water
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants breached their duty of care under the Occupiers Liability Act by failing to guard or warn about a drop caused by sand movement over a beach outfall
- 2 Whether the accident was reasonably foreseeable
- 3 Whether fencing or warning signs were necessary or practicable
Ratio Decidendi
The accident was not reasonably foreseeable and the occupiers fulfilled their duty of care; fencing or warnings were impracticable and unnecessary; the structure itself served as a warning; no liability attaches to the defendants.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- costs to be taxed, taxation postponed indefinitely
- legal aid assessment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment