Napier & Anor v Pressdram Ltd

Napier & Anor v Pressdram Ltd

There was no duty of confidentiality owed by the complainant to the solicitor regarding the outcome of the Law Society's adjudication or the Ombudsman's report. The information was not intrinsically confidential, the process did not impose such a duty, and no reasonable person in the complainant's position would have perceived such an obligation. Therefore, there was no basis to restrain publication by the press.

Parties
Appellant/claimant: Michael Napier; Appellant/claimant: Irwin Mitchell; Respondent/defendant: Pressdram Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 May 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Refusal of Injunction
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Duty of Confidentiality, Publication of Disciplinary Findings, Solicitors' Regulation, Injunctions, Public Interest
Confidentiality Media Law Professional Discipline Duty of Confidentiality Publication of Disciplinary Findings Solicitors' Regulation Injunctions Public Interest

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Napier

Appellant/claimant

Irwin Mitchell

Appellant/claimant

Pressdram Limited

Respondent/defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Refusal of Injunction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the complainant owed a duty of confidentiality to the solicitor regarding the outcome of a Law Society disciplinary adjudication and Ombudsman report
  2. 2 Whether publication by the press of such information should be restrained on grounds of confidentiality

Ratio Decidendi

There was no duty of confidentiality owed by the complainant to the solicitor regarding the outcome of the Law Society's adjudication or the Ombudsman's report. The information was not intrinsically confidential, the process did not impose such a duty, and no reasonable person in the complainant's position would have perceived such an obligation. Therefore, there was no basis to restrain publication by the press.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; no injunction granted; permission to appeal formally granted.