Duce v Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
The judge below was wrong to find that the claim, as amended and supported by the medical evidence, had no real prospect of success. The procedural errors did not justify striking out the claim, and the claimant should be allowed to amend her particulars and proceed.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Gail Marie Duce; Defendant/respondent: Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (medical Negligence) / Second Appeal From County Court Strike Out Order
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Duty to Warn, Strike Out, Relief From Sanctions, Amendment of Pleadings, Summary Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gail Marie Duce
Claimant/appellant
Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (medical Negligence) / Second Appeal From County Court Strike Out Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim should have been struck out for having no real prospect of success
- 2 Whether the claimant was required to serve expert evidence on breach of duty at the relevant stage
- 3 Whether the claimant should be granted relief from sanction for late service of a condition and prognosis report
Ratio Decidendi
The judge below was wrong to find that the claim, as amended and supported by the medical evidence, had no real prospect of success. The procedural errors did not justify striking out the claim, and the claimant should be allowed to amend her particulars and proceed.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Strike-out order set aside
- Permission to amend particulars of claim granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment