Stanislas, R. v [2016] EWCA Crim 1520 (20 September 2016)
The sentencing judge properly applied the totality principle and sentencing guidelines, taking into account the appellant's youth, role, and aggravating features. The sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive and reflected the seriousness of the offences and the aggravating circumstances, including offending while on licence.
- Citation
- [2016] EWCA Crim 1520
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Dyrell Stanislas; Applicant: Ben Ngaman
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Renewed Application for Leave
- Outcome
- Stanislas' appeal against sentence dismissed; Ngaman's renewed application for leave to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Conspiracy to Supply Drugs, Totality Principle, Dangerousness, Guilty Plea Discount
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Dyrell Stanislas
Appellant
Ben Ngaman
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Renewed Application for Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge failed to apply the totality principle for Stanislas
- 2 Whether Ngaman's sentence was excessive given his role and aggravating factors
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge properly applied the totality principle and sentencing guidelines, taking into account the appellant's youth, role, and aggravating features. The sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive and reflected the seriousness of the offences and the aggravating circumstances, including offending while on licence.
Court Disposition
Stanislas' appeal against sentence dismissed; Ngaman's renewed application for leave to appeal refused.
Orders
- Stanislas' appeal dismissed
- Ngaman's renewed application refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment