Clancy Docwra Ltd v E.ON Energy Solutions Ltd [2018] EWHC 3124 (TCC) (16 November 2018)
The Sub-Contract Works are defined by the Numbered Documents, including express exclusions set out in CDL's tender submissions and Post Tender Minutes. Works such as removal of soft spots, hand digging, breaking out obstructions, and diversion of mains and services are excluded from CDL's scope. Instructions to perform such excluded works constitute Variations under clause 5, entitling CDL to additional payment and time. The bespoke risk allocation clauses do not override the agreed scope as defined by the Numbered Documents.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 3124 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Clancy Docwra Limited; Defendant: E. ON Energy Solutions Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Construction Dispute / High Court Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations granted in favour of CDL regarding scope and entitlement to variations; rectification claim not determined as unnecessary.
- Legal Topics
- Contract Interpretation, Variation Claims, Risk Allocation, Rectification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clancy Docwra Limited
Claimant
E. ON Energy Solutions Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Construction Dispute / High Court Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of the Sub-Contract regarding scope of works and risk allocation
- 2 Entitlement to variations for excluded works
- 3 Effect of Numbered Documents on contractual obligations
Ratio Decidendi
The Sub-Contract Works are defined by the Numbered Documents, including express exclusions set out in CDL's tender submissions and Post Tender Minutes. Works such as removal of soft spots, hand digging, breaking out obstructions, and diversion of mains and services are excluded from CDL's scope. Instructions to perform such excluded works constitute Variations under clause 5, entitling CDL to additional payment and time. The bespoke risk allocation clauses do not override the agreed scope as defined by the Numbered Documents.
Court Disposition
Declarations granted in favour of CDL regarding scope and entitlement to variations; rectification claim not determined as unnecessary.
Orders
- Declarations that CDL is entitled to Variation instructions and adjustment to Sub-Contract Sum for excluded works as defined in Numbered Documents.
- Declarations that clauses 2.1.7–2.1.9 do not debar CDL's entitlement to adjustment for such Variations.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment