L (A Child), Re [2015] EWFC B188 (7 May 2015)
The mother does not have an arguable case for varying the child arrangements order or for instructing an alienation expert. There is no reliable evidence of alienation by the father, and the current arrangements are in L's best interests. The mother's refusal to have contact is of her own volition, and her applications are refused.
- Citation
- [2015] EWFC B188
- Parties
- Applicant: E; Respondent: E
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Child Arrangements / Application for Permission to Vary Child Arrangements Order and to Instruct Expert
- Outcome
- Applications refused
- Legal Topics
- Child Arrangements Order, Parental Alienation, Section 91(14) Children Act 1989, Expert Evidence, Welfare of the Child
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E
Applicant
E
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Child Arrangements / Application for Permission to Vary Child Arrangements Order and to Instruct Expert
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mother should be granted permission to apply to vary the child arrangements order under s.91(14) Children Act 1989
- 2 Whether the mother should be granted permission to instruct an 'alienation expert'
Ratio Decidendi
The mother does not have an arguable case for varying the child arrangements order or for instructing an alienation expert. There is no reliable evidence of alienation by the father, and the current arrangements are in L's best interests. The mother's refusal to have contact is of her own volition, and her applications are refused.
Court Disposition
Applications refused
Orders
- Mother's application for permission to vary the child arrangements order is refused.
- Mother's application for permission to instruct an alienation expert is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment