E v Q (Abduction: Defences)
Mother failed to prove consent; father's dismissive statements did not amount to unequivocal consent. Child's preference to remain in UK did not constitute objection. No grave risk of harm or intolerable situation established. No exceptional circumstances warranting postponement of return order. Summary return granted with protective measures.
- Parties
- Applicant: E; Respondent: Q
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Child Abduction / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application for summary return granted
- Legal Topics
- Hague Convention, Brussels II Revised, Summary Return, Consent, Child's Objections, Grave Risk of Harm, Protective Measures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E
Applicant
Q
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mother had the father's consent to relocate the children to the UK
- 2 Whether the children object to return to Poland
- 3 Whether return would expose the children to grave risk of harm or intolerable situation
Ratio Decidendi
Mother failed to prove consent; father's dismissive statements did not amount to unequivocal consent. Child's preference to remain in UK did not constitute objection. No grave risk of harm or intolerable situation established. No exceptional circumstances warranting postponement of return order. Summary return granted with protective measures.
Court Disposition
application for summary return granted
Orders
- Children to be returned to Poland within four weeks, timed to coincide with Easter break.
- Protective measures agreed by father to ensure safe and smooth transition.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment