WH Holding Ltd & Anor v E20 Stadium LLP

WH Holding Ltd & Anor v E20 Stadium LLP

The respondent is best placed to answer whether its stewarding strategy was appropriate and must provide an answer, as the applicants reasonably and urgently need this information to respond to the FA charge.

Parties
Applicants: WH Holding Limited & Anr; Respondent: E20 Stadium LLP
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 July 2018
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Contested Return Date Following Ex Parte Relief
Outcome
Application granted in part
Legal Topics
Disclosure of Information, Contractual Obligations, Compliance With Regulatory Requirements
Contract Law Disclosure of Information Contractual Obligations Compliance With Regulatory Requirements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

WH Holding Limited & Anr

Applicants

E20 Stadium LLP

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Contested Return Date Following Ex Parte Relief

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent is obliged to provide evaluative information regarding stewarding strategy under the contract
  2. 2 Scope of information the respondent must provide to enable the applicants to respond to an FA charge

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent is best placed to answer whether its stewarding strategy was appropriate and must provide an answer, as the applicants reasonably and urgently need this information to respond to the FA charge.

Court Disposition

Application granted in part

Orders

  • Respondent to provide answers to specified questions, including whether its stewarding strategy was appropriate, with liberty to qualify or explain its answer.