Heffernan, R. v

Heffernan, R. v

The trial judge made no error of law or principle in admitting the previous conviction as evidence of propensity, properly considered the fairness of its admission, and gave appropriate directions to the jury. The evidence, including DNA and witness descriptions, provided a case to answer. There were no arguable grounds of appeal.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Eamonn Liam Heffernan
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 August 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
application for leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Bad Character Evidence, Admissibility of Previous Convictions, Identification Evidence, Jury Directions, DNA Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Eamonn Liam Heffernan

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in admitting evidence of a previous conviction as bad character evidence
  2. 2 Whether there was a case to answer at the close of the prosecution case
  3. 3 Whether the judge misdirected the jury on bad character evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge made no error of law or principle in admitting the previous conviction as evidence of propensity, properly considered the fairness of its admission, and gave appropriate directions to the jury. The evidence, including DNA and witness descriptions, provided a case to answer. There were no arguable grounds of appeal.

Court Disposition

application for leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • Application for leave to appeal against conviction refused.