East Hampshire District Council v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government

East Hampshire District Council v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government

The Inspector correctly identified the breach of policy H16.2, considered material considerations, and exercised planning judgment as required by section 54A. No error of law was found in the Inspector's decision.

Parties
Appellant: East Hampshire District Council; First Respondent: The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Respondent: Mr A White; Third Respondent: Mrs A White
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
31 January 2008
Procedural Posture
Planning Appeal / High Court Appeal Against Inspector's Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Development Plan Policy, Material Considerations, Planning Permission, Local Plan Policy Breach, Costs Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

East Hampshire District Council

Appellant

The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

First Respondent

Mr A White

Second Respondent

Mrs A White

Third Respondent

Procedural Posture

Planning Appeal / High Court Appeal Against Inspector's Decision

  1. 1 Whether the Inspector erred in law by failing to properly apply section 54A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
  2. 2 Whether material considerations outweighed the breach of Local Plan Policy H16.2

Ratio Decidendi

The Inspector correctly identified the breach of policy H16.2, considered material considerations, and exercised planning judgment as required by section 54A. No error of law was found in the Inspector's decision.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appellant to pay respondent's costs assessed at £5,742