Easynet Global Services Ltd, Re
The inclusion of a dormant foreign company in a merger satisfies the definition of a cross-border merger under the 2005 Directive and the Regulations. There is no abuse of law or device as the rights to participate in cross-border mergers are wide and unconditional under EU law. The court must approve the merger if all requirements are met and there is no fraud or abuse.
- Parties
- Appellant: Easynet Global Services Ltd; Intervener: Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Cross Border Mergers, Freedom of Establishment, Abuse of Law, Interpretation of EU Directives
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Easynet Global Services Ltd
Appellant
Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the inclusion of a dormant foreign company in a merger constitutes a cross-border merger under the Companies (Cross-Border Mergers) Regulations 2007 and Directive 2005/56/EC
- 2 Whether such inclusion amounts to an abuse of law or device to circumvent domestic procedures
- 3 Whether the court has jurisdiction and discretion to approve the merger
Ratio Decidendi
The inclusion of a dormant foreign company in a merger satisfies the definition of a cross-border merger under the 2005 Directive and the Regulations. There is no abuse of law or device as the rights to participate in cross-border mergers are wide and unconditional under EU law. The court must approve the merger if all requirements are met and there is no fraud or abuse.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The proposed merger arrangements constitute a cross-border merger within the scope of the 2005 Directive and the Regulations.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment