B v B and Ors (Section 83 ACA 2002 and Step-Parent Adoption)
Section 83(1)(a) was not breached as YB was brought to the UK for education, not for adoption, and there was no settled intention to adopt in England at the time of entry. Section 83(1)(b) does not apply to step-parent adoptions, as Parliament did not intend to capture such cases, and applying it would be disproportionate and contrary to Article 8 ECHR rights. Even if section 83(1)(b) applied, any breach was inadvertent and does not prevent an adoption order, as welfare considerations outweigh public policy concerns.
- Parties
- Applicant: EB; First Respondent: RB; Second Respondent: London Borough of Havering; Third Respondent: YB (through her Children’s Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Adoption order granted
- Legal Topics
- Step Parent Adoption, International Adoption, Section 83 ACA 2002, Article 8 ECHR, Adoption With Foreign Element, Disapplication of Statutory Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
EB
Applicant
RB
First Respondent
London Borough of Havering
Second Respondent
YB (through her Children’s Guardian)
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 83(1)(a) or (b) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 applies to a step-parent adoption following a foreign adoption order
- 2 Whether breach of section 83(1)(b) prevents making an adoption order
- 3 Whether disapplication of section 83(1)(b) is necessary to prevent disproportionate interference with Article 8 rights
Ratio Decidendi
Section 83(1)(a) was not breached as YB was brought to the UK for education, not for adoption, and there was no settled intention to adopt in England at the time of entry. Section 83(1)(b) does not apply to step-parent adoptions, as Parliament did not intend to capture such cases, and applying it would be disproportionate and contrary to Article 8 ECHR rights. Even if section 83(1)(b) applied, any breach was inadvertent and does not prevent an adoption order, as welfare considerations outweigh public policy concerns.
Court Disposition
Adoption order granted
Orders
- Adoption order in favour of EB with respect to YB
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment