R v Ebrima Fatty
The sentencing judge erred by not directly applying the Children Guideline to the appellant, who was 17 at the time of the offence. The appropriate sentence should have been at the upper end of the range suggested by the guideline, namely 8 years, with a further reduction for plea, resulting in 7 years and 2 months' detention. The original sentence of 9 years was excessive.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Ebrima Fatty
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Sentence Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Youth Offenders, Wounding With Intent, Possession of Bladed Article
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Ebrima Fatty
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Sentence Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in applying insufficient reduction to the adult sentence to reflect the appellant's age at the time of the offence
- 2 Whether the Children Guideline should have been directly applied to a defendant who was 17 at the time of the offence but sentenced at 19
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred by not directly applying the Children Guideline to the appellant, who was 17 at the time of the offence. The appropriate sentence should have been at the upper end of the range suggested by the guideline, namely 8 years, with a further reduction for plea, resulting in 7 years and 2 months' detention. The original sentence of 9 years was excessive.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- The sentence of 9 years’ detention is quashed and replaced with 7 years 2 months’ detention in a young offender institution for the section 18 offence.
- All other sentences and orders remain the same.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment