Ajayi v Ebury Partners Ltd

Ajayi v Ebury Partners Ltd

Ms Ajayi was only entitled to 3,000 options based on real market value, not the discounted AMV; Ebury breached its Articles by failing to implement share transfer provisions but Ms Ajayi suffered no loss as her shares appreciated; reference to COT3 agreement in pleadings was reasonably necessary and did not breach confidentiality, so Ebury's counterclaim fails.

Parties
Claimant: Golda Ajayi; Defendant: Ebury Partners Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
31 January 2020
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim / Final Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claims and counterclaim dismissed
Legal Topics
Share Options, Articles of Association, Confidentiality Agreements, Salary Sacrifice, Good Leaver/bad Leaver Provisions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Golda Ajayi

Claimant

Ebury Partners Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Claim / Final Judgment After Trial

  1. 1 Whether Ebury agreed to grant Ms Ajayi 22,472 options or only 3,000 options
  2. 2 Whether Ebury breached its Articles of Association by failing to implement share transfer provisions
  3. 3 Whether Ms Ajayi suffered loss from Ebury's breach

Ratio Decidendi

Ms Ajayi was only entitled to 3,000 options based on real market value, not the discounted AMV; Ebury breached its Articles by failing to implement share transfer provisions but Ms Ajayi suffered no loss as her shares appreciated; reference to COT3 agreement in pleadings was reasonably necessary and did not breach confidentiality, so Ebury's counterclaim fails.

Court Disposition

Claims and counterclaim dismissed

Orders

  • Ms Ajayi’s Salary Sacrifice Claim dismissed
  • AoA Claim: breach found but no loss proven, claim dismissed