Ajayi v Ebury Partners Ltd
Ms Ajayi was only entitled to 3,000 options based on real market value, not the discounted AMV; Ebury breached its Articles by failing to implement share transfer provisions but Ms Ajayi suffered no loss as her shares appreciated; reference to COT3 agreement in pleadings was reasonably necessary and did not breach confidentiality, so Ebury's counterclaim fails.
- Parties
- Claimant: Golda Ajayi; Defendant: Ebury Partners Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Claim / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claims and counterclaim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Share Options, Articles of Association, Confidentiality Agreements, Salary Sacrifice, Good Leaver/bad Leaver Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Golda Ajayi
Claimant
Ebury Partners Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Ebury agreed to grant Ms Ajayi 22,472 options or only 3,000 options
- 2 Whether Ebury breached its Articles of Association by failing to implement share transfer provisions
- 3 Whether Ms Ajayi suffered loss from Ebury's breach
Ratio Decidendi
Ms Ajayi was only entitled to 3,000 options based on real market value, not the discounted AMV; Ebury breached its Articles by failing to implement share transfer provisions but Ms Ajayi suffered no loss as her shares appreciated; reference to COT3 agreement in pleadings was reasonably necessary and did not breach confidentiality, so Ebury's counterclaim fails.
Court Disposition
Claims and counterclaim dismissed
Orders
- Ms Ajayi’s Salary Sacrifice Claim dismissed
- AoA Claim: breach found but no loss proven, claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment