Eda Yaman v Tesco Stores Limited & Anor

Eda Yaman v Tesco Stores Limited & Anor

The trial judge's interventions did not demonstrate hostility, bias, or procedural unfairness. The interventions were appropriate for clarity and did not restrict the appellant's ability to present her case. No fair-minded observer would conclude there was a real possibility of bias or procedural irregularity. The appeal is dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: Eda Yaman; First Respondent: Tesco Stores Limited; Second Respondent: Manish Parmar
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 November 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Deceit, Conspiracy, Fraudulent Claims, Judicial Bias, Procedural Fairness, Judicial Interventions, Credit Hire, Road Traffic Accident
Tort Civil Procedure Deceit Conspiracy Fraudulent Claims Judicial Bias Procedural Fairness Judicial Interventions +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eda Yaman

Appellant

Tesco Stores Limited

First Respondent

Manish Parmar

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge demonstrated apparent bias or procedural unfairness in conduct of the trial
  2. 2 Whether excessive judicial interventions restricted the appellant's ability to present her case

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge's interventions did not demonstrate hostility, bias, or procedural unfairness. The interventions were appropriate for clarity and did not restrict the appellant's ability to present her case. No fair-minded observer would conclude there was a real possibility of bias or procedural irregularity. The appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed