Cereal Investments Company (CIC) SA v Ed&f Man Sugar Ltd [2007] EWHC 2843 (Comm) (07 December 2007)

Cereal Investments Company (CIC) SA v Ed&f Man Sugar Ltd [2007] EWHC 2843 (Comm) (07 December 2007)

The contract required only that a vessel present in October 2006; it did not require loading to be completed by 31 October 2006. The words 'Shipment at Buyer's Option, with 10 days pre-advise of vessel arrival' stand on their own, and a notional full stop is to be inserted before 'Shipment'. This construction is commercially and grammatically sensible and aligns with the panel's reasoning.

Citation
[2007] EWHC 2843 (Comm)
Parties
Claimant: Cereal Investments Company (C.I.C.) S.A.; Defendant: ED&F Man Sugar Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 December 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under S 69 Arbitration Act 1996 / Judgment on Preliminary Question
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
FOB Contracts, Letter of Credit, Contract Construction, Arbitration Appeal
Commercial Law Arbitration Contract Law FOB Contracts Letter of Credit Contract Construction Arbitration Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cereal Investments Company (C.I.C.) S.A.

Claimant

ED&F Man Sugar Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal Under S 69 Arbitration Act 1996 / Judgment on Preliminary Question

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the contract identified a shipment period requiring loading to be completed by 31 October 2006
  2. 2 Proper construction of the shipment period clause in an FOB contract

Ratio Decidendi

The contract required only that a vessel present in October 2006; it did not require loading to be completed by 31 October 2006. The words 'Shipment at Buyer's Option, with 10 days pre-advise of vessel arrival' stand on their own, and a notional full stop is to be inserted before 'Shipment'. This construction is commercially and grammatically sensible and aligns with the panel's reasoning.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Claimant's appeal on the preliminary question is dismissed
  • No decision on the main appeal question as it does not arise