Donelien v Liberata (UK) Ltd
The judge found that Ms Donelien's arguments raised sufficient unease about the Employment Tribunal's approach to warrant consideration by the full court, particularly regarding whether the employer ought reasonably to have known of her disability and whether the Tribunal properly evaluated the evidence.
- Parties
- Appellant: Edith Donelien; Respondent: Liberata (UK) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Reasonable Adjustments, Constructive Knowledge, Disability Discrimination Act, Appeal on Fact Vs Law, Perversity Grounds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edith Donelien
Appellant
Liberata (UK) Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employer ought reasonably to have known of the claimant's disability under the Disability Discrimination Act
- 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in its evaluation of the evidence regarding the employer's knowledge
- 3 Whether the Tribunal's decision was perverse or involved an error of law
Ratio Decidendi
The judge found that Ms Donelien's arguments raised sufficient unease about the Employment Tribunal's approach to warrant consideration by the full court, particularly regarding whether the employer ought reasonably to have known of her disability and whether the Tribunal properly evaluated the evidence.
Court Disposition
permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted to Ms Donelien.
- Appeal to be heard by three judges, one with employment experience, time estimate one day.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment