Berezovsky & Anor v Edmiston & Company Ltd & Anor
Edmiston & Co, through their sub-broker Merle Wood & Associates, were the effective cause of the sale of the yacht Darius to the Al Futtaim family, as their introduction was the dominant cause of the transaction. The appropriate commission is 3% of the €240 million sale price, amounting to €7.2 million. There was no contract or quantum meruit basis for MWA to claim commission directly from the Claimants.
- Parties
- Claimant: Boris Berezovsky; Claimant: Petersham Holdings Limited; Defendant: Edmiston & Company Limited; Defendant: Merle Wood & Associates Inc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Claim (brokerage Commission) / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for Edmiston & Co on their counterclaim; Claimants' claims against Edmiston & Co dismissed; Declaration of non-liability to MWA; MWA's counterclaim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Brokerage Commission, Effective Cause, Quantum Meruit, Sub Brokerage Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Boris Berezovsky
Claimant
Petersham Holdings Limited
Claimant
Edmiston & Company Limited
Defendant
Merle Wood & Associates Inc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Claim (brokerage Commission) / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Edmiston & Co were the 'effective cause' of the sale of the yacht Darius to the Al Futtaim family
- 2 What sum is due by way of commission to Edmiston & Co
- 3 Whether Merle Wood & Associates Inc has a right to commission enforceable directly against the Claimants
Ratio Decidendi
Edmiston & Co, through their sub-broker Merle Wood & Associates, were the effective cause of the sale of the yacht Darius to the Al Futtaim family, as their introduction was the dominant cause of the transaction. The appropriate commission is 3% of the €240 million sale price, amounting to €7.2 million. There was no contract or quantum meruit basis for MWA to claim commission directly from the Claimants.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Edmiston & Co on their counterclaim; Claimants' claims against Edmiston & Co dismissed; Declaration of non-liability to MWA; MWA's counterclaim dismissed.
Orders
- Claimants to pay Edmiston & Co €7.2 million as commission
- Claimants' claims against Edmiston & Co dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment