Eduardo Cortes v The Information Commissioner
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to consider the merits of the Information Commissioner's substantive findings or to grant the remedies sought by the Applicant under section 166 DPA 2018. The application has no reasonable prospect of success and must be struck out.
- Parties
- Applicant: Eduardo Cortes; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Section 166 of the Data Protection Act 2018 / Strike Out Application Determination
- Outcome
- Application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Section 166 Data Protection Act 2018, Jurisdiction of Tribunal, Appropriate Steps by Information Commissioner, Right to Complain Under GDPR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eduardo Cortes
Applicant
The Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 166 of the Data Protection Act 2018 / Strike Out Application Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to consider the merits of the Information Commissioner's response to a complaint under section 166 DPA 2018
- 2 Whether the Information Commissioner took appropriate steps as required by section 165 DPA 2018
- 3 Whether the Applicant is entitled to costs
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to consider the merits of the Information Commissioner's substantive findings or to grant the remedies sought by the Applicant under section 166 DPA 2018. The application has no reasonable prospect of success and must be struck out.
Court Disposition
Application struck out
Orders
- Proceedings are struck out pursuant to rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 as there is no reasonable prospect of success.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment