Devoy v Social Security Commissioner [2001] EWCA Civ 978 (14 June 2001)
Neither European Union law nor human rights law provides the applicant with a right to child benefit allocation contrary to the decision of the Secretary of State under domestic law, and there is no right of appeal against such allocation.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 978
- Parties
- Applicant: Edward Francis Devoy; Respondent: Social Security Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permission to Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Application for Permission to Appeal From Social Security Commissioner
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Child Benefit Allocation, Appeal Rights, Equality of Treatment Under EU Law, Discretion of Secretary of State, Human Rights Act 1998
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edward Francis Devoy
Applicant
Social Security Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Application for Permission to Appeal From Social Security Commissioner
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether European Union law (Regulation 1408/71) entitles the applicant to child benefit contrary to domestic allocation
- 2 Whether the Human Rights Act 1998 or the European Convention on Human Rights provides a right to child benefit allocation different from domestic law
- 3 Whether the Secretary of State's discretion in allocating child benefit is subject to appeal or judicial review
Ratio Decidendi
Neither European Union law nor human rights law provides the applicant with a right to child benefit allocation contrary to the decision of the Secretary of State under domestic law, and there is no right of appeal against such allocation.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment